The same file, different interface testing time is floating out more.

The user through the bottom of the test results for more obscure, but by the actual file copy will be clear.

 

The same file, different interface testing time is floating out more.

 

4GB high-definition video copying files, USB interface, 120 seconds with a time, while the eSATA interface, 44 seconds with a time difference of 3 times; in the copy of the fragmented files, USB interface, 223 seconds with a time, and eSATA interfaces was 88 seconds.

 

In the past, we use small-capacity mobile storage products, the feeling is very fast to copy files, then USB2.0 can be very good for us.

 

But now copy the file using 100GB USB2.0 interface transfer is painful, after all, bigger capacity and speed is not fixed in situ.

 

Test to see, eSATA interface, the bottom of the test or whether it is the actual file copy tests are leading USB2.0 interface, up to 3 times, so we can see that the interface can give full play to the internal hard disk performance.

 

But only downside is that if you use eSATA interface must be as if the power supply equipment with USB2.O, or even with eSATA interface is unable to start the mobile hard disk.